When you read about Gov. Bobby Jindals announcement regarding the 258 line-item vetoes, do you get the sense hes bragging? Yesterday, Jindals press secretary Melissa Sellers sent out a release with the headline: Governor Jindal Announces 258 Vetoes of More Than $16 Million in HB 1, Most Vetoes in LA History.
Okay, without debating the virtues or faults of each individual veto, doesnt this from the outset indicate a lack of communication between Jindal and the Legislature? When the Governor feels he has to personally strike out 258 budget items, more than twice the number executed in the past 12 years, it leaves you wondering why these actions werent discussed between Jindal and the leges before it got to this point.
Within Sellerss release, Jindal writes:
Therefore, below is a list of criteria for NGO [Nongovernmental Organization] funding required to gain my support; and as such, any NGO funding passed by the Legislature that does not meet the following criteria will be vetoed. NGO funding passed by the State Legislature:From there, Jindal lists out all 258 vetoes. When the item in question is a NonGovernmental Organization, Jindal simply writes: This is a NonGovernmental Organization (NGO) funding request, which did not meet the criteria established in my letter of April 30, 2008. Therefore, I am vetoing this item.
- Must have statewide or substantial regional impact.
- Must have been presented/openly discussed during the legislative session.
- Must be a state agency priority.
- Must have the proper disclosure form published online prior to consideration for funding (consistent with information provided in the House disclosure form).
Is that enough? Shouldnt Jindal give voters and legislators a more complete explanation? Doesnt the Office of Elderly Affairs, Senior Centers Program, deserve more?
When I suggested Jindal warm up his veto pen, I hoped he might use it periodically and judiciously. I didnt think hed run out of ink.
God's speed, Rodrigue
A word to the wise. NEVER celebrate after you have been declared cancer free. You…
to "Clancy's Reckoning;" If you have any doubt about Gambit's judgement of character chew on…
George was a rare person who never said a bad thing about anyone and likewise…
From the Spin article: "While Hope Road legally has the trademark to the phrase in…