Keith Thomson makes a convincing argument for online gambling sites as a more reliable predictor of presidential victory than cable and network news. Some prime pieces of evidence:
Michael Robb, political expert for the British bookmaking site Betfair.com, lets the record speak for itself: Halfway through Election Day in 2004, when a CNN poll showed Kerry taking the lead, Betfair had Bush with a 91% chance to win. Betfair also had all 50 states right in 2004. As did rival site Intrade.
Currently, Betfair lists Barack Obama as an overwhelming 1-7 favorite (paying $8 for a $7 winning bet). A John McCain win would pay $6.80 for every dollar bet.
"On Election Night I'll look at the movement on the betting sites to see what's going on," Strumpf says. "I watch CNN too, out of the corner of an eye, but it's not necessary."
A friendly reminder: Wagering on elections is illegal in America.
Jackie says..."now when I was first elected to the council back during the civil war...."
all I want for Christmas is for Gray and Lewis to go away,and leave my…
At times like this one can only wonder what they "all " was thinking. One…
This is awesome. Yet more great things for the area. Now that I know about…
GTFO, you senile bitch!
Jeez. Another corrupt piece of shit. Take a hike, hyphen!