Sometimes people with the best intentions, can make some pretty big mistakes.
Louisiana Voices for Change, a group of childrens advocates, labor, faith and community-based organizations held a press conference this morning to unveil a new short film criticizing Sen. David Vitters voting record on the State Childrens Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), which provides health insurance to low-income families.
The short film tells viewers how there are thousands of families in Louisiana who dont have health insurance, and then tells the story of Chris and Tiffany Starnes and Reily, their 17-month-old daughter. Reily was born a month premature, and had numerous medical problems (shes a healthy little girl now), which necessitated a month-long stay in the neonatal intensive care unit and several surgeries. By the time Reily was six months old, her medical bills exceeded $1 million.
We then find out how Sen. Vitter, a father of four who has run on a platform of family values, has voted three times against the SCHIP program, which, according to film, voted AGAINST Childrens Healthcare Program enhancement bill that would have helped families like the Starnes.
Lets recap: the Starnes are in the hole for $1 million in medical costs, and Vitter voted against a program that could have helped the Starnes, right?
Wrong. Ill admit Ive now watched this video many times and Ive had my editor view it as well and we both come to the conclusion that the film implies the Starnes didnt have medical insurance.
We have medical insurance and were very fortunate for that, says Chris Starnes.
Okay, so what about the million dollars? Tiffany Starnes says the total was actually more than $1.5 million in medical charges, but their health insurance paid it. The only thing the Starnes were responsible for was their deductible.
I wasnt sure what to make of this, so I called Helene OBrien, president of the local Service Employees International Union (SEIU). OBrien is a member of Louisiana Voices for Change, and SEIUs name is superimposed across the anti-Vitter film. OBrien says she knew the Starnes had medical insurance, but added, Well, they are on the hook for a million dollars. Thats news to the Starnes.
The Gambit has come out in favor of SCHIP previously, and we will continue to support a program that provides health insurance for kids. And were certainly not against criticizing David Vitter http://bestofneworleans.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A39596 . But if youre going to make a film about SCHIP and Vitter, find an uninsured family who has mounting medical bills because they cant afford health insurance.
There are thousands of them in Louisiana.
Note: The Starnes are a great family. Tiffany was one of our Forty Under Forty honorees and Chris owns and operates Coffea Café in the Bywater.
Showing 1-1 of 1
I am glad to see this article, as I was very upset to hear that my situation was misrepresented. Ironically, I have since changed jobs and Reily does not qualify for a new insurance plan. At 18 months nobody will take her because she is too much of a liability. And we make enough not to qualify for state funded programs. So, we now have a "catastrophic" policy to protect us from drastic costs. If her expenses exceed $10,000 the insurance will be worth it. Unfortunately, that also means that I will be coming out of pocket for everything up to that, which is a hefty expense. I am extremely lucky to have a great job in these tough economic times and am setting up a FSA to help mitigate the burden. But, unfortunately, I am embarrassed to admit that I choose doctor visits for myself very wisely so as not to spend those savings. If it is a choice between allergy medication for me or ongoing care for my child...obviously, I will live with sniffles. That is an easy sacrifice. But what about the parents who have to wait until payday to take their kid to the doctor, causing the child to get sicker in the meantime? It's a terrible situation that no parent should ever find themselves in. It is my opinion as a fierce and devoted mother that there is never an excuse for a child to go without necessary care and if the impediment to that care is insurance, we need to rethink our system.