As the City Council prepares to vote today on Councilman Fielkows ordinance requiring the Mayor Nagins office to comply with Louisiana Open Meetings Law regarding the awarding of professional services contracts, City Attorney Penya Moses-Fields says the issue has never really been about transparency, but has more to do with how the meetings law should be enacted and Councilman Fielkows political ambition.
Moses-Fields maintains the Council cannot use a legislative ordinance to force the executive branch to comply with state open meetings law because city charter, which spells out both the legislative and executive procedures for awarding service contracts, supersedes state law in this instance. As Moses-Field first opined in an August 14, 2008, letter to the council, the only procedure for changing how the mayor awards contracts is by proposing an amendment to the city charter, and letting voters decide.
I just want to make it clear my issue is that the ordinance mechanism is an illegal approach, says Moses-Fields. She adds that the mayors procedure for awarding contracting is a transparent process.
After Moses-Fields August opinion, Fielkow brought the matter up with the state attorney generals office, which has sided twice with the council on the matter. The city attorney replies that the attorney generals opinions are not binding, and if a change should be made, it should be a permanent one.
Ive made this joke before: when something is done by ordinance, its as good as the next council meeting. It can be changed, Moses-Fields says. With something of this magnitude, why not take it back to the people? Because I believe there is enough community support to put this in the charter.
If the ordinance passes today, Nagin will have 10 days to decide to veto the measure, or let it become law. Moses-Field says if the council had followed her original opinion, the amendment could have been up for vote in this past election, November 4.
So what is motivating the council to vote on the ordinance?
The councils motivation? The council is all seven. I think this is Councilmember Fielkows motivation, because he has future aspirations. So I wont know the councils motivation until after today based on everyones support.
Stay tuned for how the council votes on the measure, and Fielkows response.
Tempred to call CPS?
No case here. You can't copyright or trademark a song title.
The Marley estate was foolish not to trademark the phrase themselves. They have created a…
Double D, you don't make up the majority. It's just that local and state politicians…
Some people just don't get it and never will. Glad you do not make up…