

The new plan, which will be executed under the name "NOLA Media Group," will leave New Orleans without a daily newspaper. The original Picayune originally published in 1837.
A memo under the name of outgoing publisher Ashton Phelps went out to staff this morning stating "Many current employees of The Times-Picayune and NOLA.com will have the opportunity to grow with the new organizations, but the need to reallocate resources to accelerate the digital growth of NOLA Media Group will necessitate a reduction in the size of the workforce."
The result, according to the memo, will be "a more robust newspaper." (Insert hollow laugh here.)
Phelps, whose family has steered the T-P for five generations, is being replaced by Ricky Mathews, publisher of the Mobile Press-Register and president of Advance Alabama/Mississippi.
AnnouncementSent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:21 AM
To all employees:
We wanted to make you aware of a news story that will be posted on NOLA.com regarding the future of the company, and to alert you that we will be scheduling meetings to discuss it with groups of employees today.

David Carr's report comes after a tumultuous week in the T-P newsroom, which began after incoming publisher Ricky Mathews came to New Orleans last week and held meetings with some — but not all — Times-Picayune executives off the building's premises.
Multiple sources have told Gambit that editor Jim Amoss and city editor Gordon Russell were in the meetings, as were sports editor Doug Tatum and features editor Mark Lorando. Managing editors Peter Kovacs and Dan Shea, the No. 2 lieutenants to Amoss, were excluded.
As for what the newsroom itself will become, the outlook is still unclear, though everyone expects significant layoffs to occur soon. As Carr wrote, "the newspaper will likely cease to exist as a daily newspaper, and will publish two or three times a week."
A Gambit source whose timeline of the reductions dovetails closely with Carr's report said in an email earlier this week that it was expected "the staff will immediately be whacked by at least a third (from 150 to 100 or fewer reporters). Top brass will be fired and reporters who remain aboard will take sharp salary cuts and be expected to start blogging through the day [for affiliated website NOLA.com]."
Carr's report says that the restructuring will mean longtime editors Kovacs and Shea will be leaving the paper, which Gambit also confirmed earlier this week with multiple sources. Carr says Amoss will be leaving as well, which Gambit was not able to confirm independently.
Reached by phone Wednesday before The New York Times story broke, Russell refused all comment about the paper, the future of the paper or his role there.
The level of disrespect for T-P employees by upper management was the main topic of conversation tonight. All employees with whom Gambit spoke — even longtime senior writers and editors — said they learned of their fates from The New York Times report.
"My supervisor didn't even fucking know," said one reporter. "My supervisor."
"I had to find this out by Twitter," said another. "Do I go in to the office tomorrow? Do I even have a job to go in to tomorrow? I don't know. No one has called me. No one has said anything."
News website redesigns are all the rage these days, from this much-discussed "improvement" to The Lens' makeover (nice!) and, today, a new WDSU.com (good job). And then there's our new mobile site. But none of them are a patch on what The Baltimore Sun did today to commemorate its 175th anniversary. Check it out.
Sal Perricone, the assistant U.S. Attorney whose online comments severely embarrassed the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney Jim Letten, handed in his resignation last night, according to a brief press release sent out this morning by Letten's office. The resignation, Letten points out, does not end the investigation into his online activities that was requested by Letten's office.
Perricone, under the handle "Henry L. Mencken1951," posted hundreds of comments on nola.com, the online arm of Advance Publications, which publishes The Times-Picayune. For more on the case, read Clancy DuBos' most recent column, "The Sudden Dubiety of His Redoubt."
The press release from the U.S. Attorney's office is under the jump.
Here's an example of the barbed humor in the Thursday strip, as described by Romenesko:
In the stirrups, she is telling a nurse that she doesn’t want a transvaginal exam. Doctor says “Sorry miss, you’re first trimester. The male Republicans who run Texas require that all abortion seekers be examined with a 10″ shaming wand.” She asks “Will it hurt?” Nurse says, “Well, it’s not comfortable, honey. But Texas feels you should have thought of that.” Doctor says, “By the authority invested in me by the GOP base, I thee rape.”
A representative for Trudeau's newspaper syndicate, United Press Syndicate, told Fox News that replacement strips would be made available for papers that want them.
The Oregonian of Portland, Ore. — which, like The Times-Picayune, is owned by Advance Publications —Â wrote a letter to its readers today explaining why it wouldn't be running the strips. Would the T-P follow suit?
Reached by phone this afternoon, Times-Picayune editor Jim Amoss said, "I don’t want to be disingenuous, but we don’t discuss our editorial deliberations in advance." Amoss said he'd read the strips, but didn't say whether the paper would be publishing Doonesbury next week: "I’m afraid you’re just going to have to stay tuned."
The Oregonian article said that the Los Angeles Times and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch were among the papers choosing not to run Doonesbury next week. In an interview late today with The Washington Post, Trudeau said that to ignore the Texas law "would be comedy malpractice."
So the vacant dining critic seat at The New York Times — currently occupied by temporary seat-sitter Eric Asimov — has been the subject of musical chairs in recent weeks, and word had it that only two men were in final contention to sit there officially: Times dining editor Pete Wells (the "inside the paper" choice) and The Times-Picayune's own bean man, Brett Anderson (the "bringing someone in" choice).
Today we know: It's Wells, not Anderson. POLITICO's Dylan Byers got the scoop and the internal Times memo announcing the appointment, which should be leaked into general dissemination in three... two... one... *
This is the second time The New York Times took Anderson's measure for the seat; he was considered in 2009, when the vacancy ended up going to another Times insider, Sam Sifton (now the paper's national editor).
What does Anderson think of this? Don't know; he's on a two-week vacation in Argentina.
* See? What did we tell you? Internal NYT memo under the jump.
For the record, half a dozen independent and reputable sources have told Eater that New Orleans' Brett Anderson, the James Beard award-winning critic of the Times Picayune, is a shoe-in for the recently vacated New York Times critic job (and he's not denying it). Some say he and his wife have already made the move to New York.
There's at least two problems with this: Brett's not married, and he was spotted in the Marigny this morning (see, we can play Page Six too). But maybe he was getting coffee and mochi balls on his way to the airport. Who knows. We've got a call in to him.
One month ago, when the rumor first surfaced, he was all Mr. No Comment.
EDITED TO ADD: Wow, Eater got the inaccuracies pulled in under 10 minutes. You scamps are fast.
It was no big secret that last time The New York Times was looking for a new food critic — waaaay back in 2009 — one of the names on the paper's short list was Brett Anderson, the bean-bestowing critic of The Times-Picayune. The job ended up going to an internal choice, Sam Sifton, but last week Sifton announced he was moving up to be the Times' national editor, once again leaving a vacancy in what is almost certainly the most powerful food journalism job in the country.
So who's short-listed this time around? Media sources are speculating that Pete Wells, the Times' Dining editor, is likely to be tapped. (Wells filled in on a temporary basis between Sifton and Sifton's precedessor, Frank Bruni.) But Anderson is still on good paper with the Times, his writing continues to win national awards, he's a bigfoot in the Association of Food Journalists and behind the scenes , he's well liked by his peers ... and his name has been floated about in the last week.
Has he been talking to the Times again? "No comment," Anderson said tonight.
Does Anderson know if he's really on the short list? Would he take the job this time if it was offered?
"No comment." "No comment."
And that was that.