 |
| LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
|
04 15 03 |
The Costs of
Crime
Katy Reckdahl's critique
of the "prison-industrial complex" in her article ("Big Picture," April
1) unfortunately looks at only one small part of the picture. Families of felons
are hurt when their loved ones are incarcerated (whatever the likelihood prisons
are teaming with good parents). However, we must also calculate the benefits
to everyone of fewer felons on the street, not the least of which are the residents
of Treme.
Ms. Reckdahl discussed the costs of policing and jailing criminals in certain areas. Certainly this is a tiny percentage of the cost to individuals and society from crime. Most career criminals will commit dozens of crimes during a lifetime. Keeping felons in prison (especially until middle age when men commit many fewer violent acts) greatly reduces the number of crimes.
The costs to victims and society resulting
from crimes are enormous. The murder victim leaves orphans to be cared
for.
Theft increases the costs to
everyone through higher product prices and insurance costs. Can a price ever
reflect the damage done to a victim of rape or child abuse? Perhaps Ms. Reckdahl
should visit the victims of crime and their families when she writes about
the "prison-industrial complex."
From the late 1950s to the early '90s the
crime rate stubbornly increased. This occurred through periods of recession
and
prosperity. Curiously, incarceration
rates fell during this period. However, since the early '90s, there has been
a dramatic increase in incarceration rates as a result of reforms like "three strikes" laws.
Not surprisingly, this has coincided with a dramatic decrease in crime throughout
the nation. This has been expensive, but arguably a very wise investment
when we think of the murders, rapes and assaults prevented.
Instead of attacking incarceration, Ms. Reckdahl should have focused her energy on our pointless and expensive imprisoning of those possessing small amounts of drugs. By reforming drug laws, we free up lots of prison space so that we can incarcerate more violent criminals for longer periods of time. An actual big picture approach takes into account not just the cost to felons' families but also the benefits to victims' families and, most importantly, the benefits of fewer crimes to everyone.
--Randy Boudreaux
Asking for Credit
We appreciate
your publishing information about filing for the Earned Income Tax Credit ("Money on the Table," April
8) and your discussing Total Community Action Inc.'s aggressive promotion of
EITC in tax year 2003, as in previous years. We nevertheless feel your treatment
is more of a diatribe than educational, i.e. informing employers and low-income
workers about the benefits of the EITC.
Because of the benefit of EITC to citizens, our local economy, and by extension the state of Louisiana, we respectfully ask that you consider what is being done and how our citizens can access the services. Some examples include:
• TCA Inc. operates eight VITA sites
in partnership with the Internal Revenue Service;
• The impact of last year's effort
was more than $700,000 in EITC refunds;
• Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) claims
processed were more than $10 million;
• Filers saved more than $170,000
in preparation fees and Rapid Refund loan charges;
• With the help of the city, TCA Inc.,
IRS, NOLAC, Sens. Bajoie and Irons, and Reps. Murray and Lucus, TCA developed
and distributed a video
to more than 3,000 businesses, community-based organizations, elected officials
of City of New Orleans, and faith-based institutions;
• TCA Inc. aggressively implemented
an outreach program that includes faith-based institutions, beauty parlors,
barber
shops, and institutions
serving low income persons;
• Channel 6 donated airtime promoting
the EITC program equaling more than $100,000 to date;
• At this writing, TCA had processed
more than 1,700 tax returns for tax year 2003;
• TCA advises eligible citizens who
have filed their taxes and not applied for EITC that they can file EITC
by amending
their taxes;
Again, we appreciate your effort.
--Peter Dangerfield
Executive Director Total Community Action Inc.
Helmet Head
Three cheers
for Gov. Mike Foster. While I am not a motorcyclist, I do not see the necessity
for
other non-riders to be so determined to fault the governor for his stand ("Born to Be Riled?," April
1).
I cannot help but feel that those pushing for the compulsory helmet law are extremely confused. Their arguments suggest they are lobbying to repeal a law that prohibits motorcyclists from wearing helmets.
Did I miss something? Is there such a law, or isn't anyone free to avail himself of the benefits of a helmet if he wants to? Is it really necessary for the state to require a person to do something legal if he wants to do it? Are we as a people now so insecure that we must petition the government to pass law after law restricting our individual freedoms? Are we so weak that we must shift personal decisions to the government in order to avoid the responsibilities that accompany them?
I am convinced that, when our last freedom has disappeared, it will not be the result of a conquering enemy but from the weak among us that are perfectly happy to swap freedom's responsibilities for the wet-nursing of a paternalistic government. If you want to wear a helmet when you ride, by all means wear one. It's legal, and no one will stop you.
--Thomas D. Freeman
'Rich Boy Mike'
--Why can't the other
publications and citizens in Louisiana wake up and see Gov. Warbucks as Clancy
DuBos does
("Born to Be Riled?," April
1)? Rich Boy Mike inherited all of his wealth and gets his way through money
and intimidation. The man is a bully and a terrible governor.
--Eddie Schmidt
| Letters is an open forum for our readers. Letters should be original to Gambit Weekly and be no longer than 400 words. Letters might be edited for length and clarity. Write to Letters, c/o Gambit Weekly, 3923 Bienville St., NOLA, 70119; fax to (504) 483-3116, or send email to response@gambitweekly.com. Include a home address and daytime phone number. |

Other Stories This Week in News & Views:
Commentary
Sizing Up the Problem
News Feature
Sweet Victory
Unplugged
Bouquets & Brickbats
The Best and the Worst of the Week
Politics
Rich Men, Poor Men
Virgets
Every Dog Will Have His ... Birthday?
Penny Post
How Close Should You Sit?
Recently in Letters to the Editor:
Letters to the Editor 04 01 03
Letters to the Editor 02 18 03
Letters to the Editor 02 11 03
Letters to the Editor Archives

|
 |