 |
Jumping the Pond
Wrong Men & Notorious Women offers a look at Alfred Hitchcock's evolution from great director to master of suspense.
FILM: Wrong
Men & Notorious Women: Five Hitchcock Thrillers 1935-1946 (The
39 Steps, The Lady Vanishes, Rebecca, Spellbound, Notorious)
DIRECTOR: Alfred Hitchcock
STARRING: Robert Donat, Madeleine Carroll, Margaret Lockwood,
Michael Redgrave, Laurence Olivier, Joan Fontaine, Gregory Peck,
Ingrid Bergman, Cary Grant
WHERE: The Criterion Collection (www.criterionco.com)
GRADE: A+
 |
Editor's Note: A look
at the works of Alfred Hitchcock continues our online-only series,
"Revisiting the Masters," reviewing recent and upcoming DVD gift
sets of some of film's great directors.
In a career crammed with pivotal periods, Sir Alfred Hitchcock's
transition from London to Hollywood is easily one of the most
revealing. Fans always salivate over the golden era of the 1950s,
which started with Stage Fright and ended gloriously
with North by Northwest (with Vertigo, To Catch
a Thief and Rear Window in between). But really,
Hitchcock was reaping the benefits of the foundation he laid
at the end of the 1930s and the beginning of the 1940s, which
cover his move to America. He ended his days in jolly old England
with works such as The 39 Steps (1935) and The Lady
Vanishes (1938) before teaming up with David O. Selznick
-- a collaboration that produced the early smash Rebecca
(1940) and Spellbound (1945) before one of his true masterpieces,
1946's Notorious.
The Criterion Collection has repackaged DVD releases of these
films into a gift set titled Wrong Men & Notorious Women:
Five Hitchcock Thrillers 1935-1946, and the resulting viewing
shows a master in the making. In America, Hitchcock gained access
to immense production values worthy of his elegant storytelling
and technical magic. It was, as critic/historian David Thomson
so eloquently put it, "like driving a Cadillac after a Morris
Minor" -- nothing would ever be the same afterward.
The title of this set is a bit misleading; while all Hitchcock
movies inevitably get the "thriller" tag, there's more texture
than thrill going on here. You can see Hitchcock's storytelling
mature seemingly with each film, and not just because of the
increased budgets. Yes, there's plenty of suspense, but more
importantly, by the end of the period, Hitchcock is exploring
complicated notions of love, duty and his favorite theme, identity.
Indeed, Notorious is not so much a thriller, or even
a suspense yarn, as it is a potentially tragic love story in
which two people fight to overcome their contrasting notions
of duplicity and guilt to come together. Hitchcock was fascinated
with several aspects of human nature, not the least of which
was our wrestling with it. (Actions, as Cary Grant's Devlin
says in Notorious, speak louder than words.)
 |
Hitchcock was apparently reaching a plateau by the end of
the 1930s. He'd established himself as one of England's best
directors, having produced such popular works as Murder
and the first The Man Who Knew Too Much. Already his
themes were being established: identity, memory, guilt, fear
or defiance of authority and so on. But Hitchcock was also hitting
an early stride, as The 39 Steps and The Lady Vanishes
prove. My personal favorite is unquestionably The 39 Steps,
which is just as breezy and witty as North by Northwest;
Hitchcock's ability to contrast danger and humor, love and death
were already on full display. Steps also shows Hitchcock's
uncanny knack for casting; for a man whose supposed disdain
of actors was legendary (if not mythic), he sure knew who fit
in his roles.
In The 39 Steps, it's the love/hate bond forged by
Robert Donat and Madeleine Carroll as Donat's fugitive "wrong
man" character Richard Hannay tries to convince Carroll's abductee
Pamela of his innocence (and ultimately, his love). The seeds
of flight, fancy, romance and commitment, which will become
manifest in North by Northwest, are already being laid.
The Lady Vanishes gets a lot more credit than it deserves,
despite equally superb casting of Margaret Lockwood as fiancee
Iris forced into detective work aboard a train, opposite Michael
Redgrave's charming Gilbert -- again, two opposites who ultimately
attract. There is plenty to be said about Hitchcock's commentary
on contemporary Europe and the isolationism of the day, but
there's not as much to be said for the comparatively claustrophobic
cinematography and awkward climactic shootout.
Hitchcock was ready for a change of pace. He was ready for
Hollywood. Unfortunately, Hollywood initially wasn't ready for
him; most of the major studios didn't think the Brit could deliver
on big-budget fare until David O. Selznick took a chance on
him. The original plan was to have Hitchcock do a Titanic movie,
but that idea eventually was dropped. (You lucky dog, James
Cameron!)
 |
Then
came Daphne Du Mauerier's popular novel Rebecca, the rights
to which Hitchcock had toyed with buying but couldn't afford.
Selznick could and convinced Hitchcock this should be his American
debut. The result was an unqualified smash success of a gothic
melodrama -- the ultimate chick flick, if you will.
More importantly, Rebecca -- especially now, upon closer
inspection -- showed what could happen when a maverick producer
"tames" a maverick director. One of the great misconceptions
about Hollywood's big-studio days is that the producers were
meddling tyrants who knew only profit margins. (No, that's the
producers of today.) Selznick was a story hound with
an eye for casting. It was he who kept pushing Joan Fontaine
as the clumsy, no-name mouse of a girl who is swept away by
the brooding Maxim de Winter (Laurence Olivier). (Hitchcock
favored Margaret Sullavan.) It was Selznick who insisted on
being faithful to the novel, while Hitchcock wanted to treat
the book as he would anyone else's work: like clay to be molded
to his whims.
Selznick also provided Hitchcock with the kind of budget he
needed to make his story larger than life, and it's evident
in the set design for the massive Manderley mansion. In fact,
there were two Manderleys built, one a miniature as big as a
barn, the other half its size and built on another stage. The
place is a study in contrasts, equally grand and claustrophobic,
warm and cool. Not that Selznick was dead-on all the time. His
Hollywood ways steered him toward insisting that a huge billow
of smoke from the burning Manderley form the letter "R." Hitchcock
resisted, opting instead for a more subtle shot of flames flickering
against a pillow with an embroidered "R."
So Rebecca became a collaboration, a test of wills,
with the ultimate product winning the Academy Award for Best
Picture. (Hitchcock, who never won an Oscar, lost out to director
John Ford for The Grapes of Wrath. It would not be the
last time he'd lose to a worthy opponent.)
In Criterion's two-disc set, much attention is paid to the
backstory of Rebecca, chronicling the casting challenges
(complete with screen tests for everyone including Anne Baxter
and Vivien Leigh), the production challenges and the use of music
in the film. It's one of Criterion's better packages, including
three hours of radio-show adaptations and a 22-page liner-note
booklet.
 |
Spellbound -- made five years after Rebecca and
after successes such as Suspicion, Saboteur and
Lifeboat -- was a wildly successful film that won six
Oscar nominations and continued Gregory Peck's rise to fame.
And yet, despite repeated viewings, it's difficult to see what
the fuss was all about. Even Hitchcock, in his interviews with
Francois Truffaut, conceded that it was "just another manhunt
story wrapped up in pseudo-psychoanalysis." No wonder; the inspiration
came from Selznick, who himself had just discovered the wonders
of the practice and apparently wanted to share them, however
clumsily, with the rest of the world.
Regardless, Spellbound was a showcase for Ingrid Bergman
and Gregory Peck (who would in just a few short years mature
into a much greater actor). The film also has novelty value
for surrealist Salvador Dali's now-famous dream sequence. Perhaps
the most interesting thing about Spellbound, though,
is how much better Bergman is in the following year's Notorious.
Or maybe it's just a testament to proper casting; Bergman is
never quite convincing as a coldly scientific psychiatrist who
falls head over heels for Peck (though at the time, every American
woman did). Maybe it's listening to the dulcet tones of her
Swedish accent delivering rote academic shrinkspeak.
Yet, in Notorious, she is beyond convincing as a woman
with a reputation recruited by the federal government for some
wartime spying on Nazi agents working in Brazil. Part of it is
the simple fact that, in spite of her glamorous star status, Bergman
was also a first-rate actress. Watch the quick-change of expressions
she displays in an early attempt to woo Nazi collaborator Alex
Sebastian (Claude Rains, never more seedy and sympathetic
all at once). Her face flitters from allure to disgust to grimace
to sweet smile in a matter of seconds.
Part of this is also Hitchcock's economy of scale; it's definitely
one of his tightest works and simplest plots. But the themes
are complex. Hitchcock, who's always unfairly been criticized
for being too cold in his work, tells a love story in a way
that few other directors could, and one suspects that Bergman
locked in early on what he was trying to accomplish. Here we
have two people who might be meeting at exactly the wrong time:
Cary Grant's FBI agent Devlin is wary of women in general, but
Bergman's Alicia in particular; she's known as a fast woman,
and she's the daughter of a recently convicted Nazi collaborator.
Plus, she's a boozer (like that would stop Cary Grant!).
As the story develops, we wind up with two people who alternately
love and hate each other almost to death. How utterly human.
Devlin keeps pushing Alicia into the arms of Sebastian, insisting
it's part of her job but daring her to back out to prove her
love to him. Alicia keeps waiting for one single word of love
from Devlin but keeps drifting further away from him -- partly
out of duty, but mostly out of spite. When Devlin finally comes
to his senses, it's just in the nick of time, for Sebastian
and his evil mother have caught on to the scam and are slowly
poisoning Alicia. The only way Devlin can keep Alicia awake
as he tries to sneak her out of the Rio de Janeiro mansion is
by finally admitting the truth. Love is life, after all.
You can also see this at play in North by Northwest;
Grant is once again playing a bit of a charming cad, who literally
and figuratively must sober up to the realities of life and
-- more importantly -- of love. When he sympathetically asks
Eva-Marie Saint's double agent if life's been that bad and,
if so, why, she softly responds, "Because of men like you."
What a comeuppance.
And that couldn't happened without films as layered as Notorious.
Shockingly, Hitchcock didn't even rate an Oscar nomination for
this film, but history -- as Criterion once again proves --
has served him better.
Next week: Charlie Chaplin.

Other Stories This Week in Movies:
Balcony Seats
Spellbound
Hulk
28 Days Later
Film Listings
Recently in Balcony Seats:
Manito 06 17 03
North by Northwest 06 17 03
The Erich von Stroheim Collection (Deluxe Collector's Edition): Blind Husbands, The Great Gabbo, Queen Kelly, Foolish Wives, The Man You Loved to Hate 06 17 03
Balcony Seats Archives
Other Stories by David Lee Simmons:
Food News 06 17 03
Food News 06 10 03
The Italian Job 06 10 03
David Lee Simmons Archives

|
 |