OneStat Web Analytics
 
Best of New Orleans
Best of New Orleans Movies Film Reviews

Music

Cuisine

Classifieds

Movies

Classifieds

Shopping

Gambit Weekly



Compare Hotel Rates for New Orleans
and Save!
Date of Arrival
Nights
Rooms
Adults


Other Cities
Movies
Cover Story Features News Arts & Entertainment Gambit Weekly TOC

FILM REVIEW By Shala Carlson 11 11 03
Respond to
this Story
Respond to this Story


Third and Wrong

FILM: The Matrix Revolutions (R)
DIRECTOR: Andy and Larry Wachowski
STARRING: Keanu Reeves, Carrie-Anne Moss
WHERE: Wide release
GRADE: D

Neo Classic: Getting to see Keanu Reeves in the long black coat one more time is the only high point of The Matrix Revolutions.
Leave it to the iconoclastic Wachowski brothers to disprove the old adage that good things come in threes. Where the first two Matrix movies were pieces of cinematic art, Matrix Revolutions is just a movie -- and not even a very good one, at that.

In 1999, The Matrix put the motion back in motion picture, revolutionizing the way action movies will look for a generation. Its sequel earlier this year, Matrix Reloaded, kept to the standard, wearying some with its brain-twisting explication but electrifying fans nonetheless with its inventiveness and relentless originality. With that in mind, the utter mediocrity of Matrix Revolutions is epically incomprehensible. Could it be that the Wachowskis' complicated construct reached critical mass in their second effort, imploding on the way to a third? Now we know exactly how Neo felt when he took that red pill and woke up to a world gone horribly wrong.

There is shockingly little plot. Yes, Neo fulfills his destiny, which involves a bit of brooding, a who-cares conversation with what can only be thought of as the Big Giant Head and a too-little-too-late showdown with Agent Smith (Hugo Weaving, gone over the top and then some). The City of Zion meets its fate, which involves way too many cheesy special effects stretched out interminably across the middle section of the movie. Thematically, almost everything good about Reloaded -- the tantalizingly evil Merovingian (Lambert Wilson), the Luke-I-am-your-father disclosure of the Architect -- is squandered, sometimes forgotten altogether. Sure, Revolutions wraps up the story arc, but its simplistic, saw-it-coming-a-mile-away, dumber-than-Reloaded ending is nothing more than a multi-million dollar insult.

Matrix Revolutions has two big problems: little-to-no Matrix time and not nearly enough Neo. They're both there, but only as ghosts in the machine. Being inside the Matrix was always the film series' forte; the real world and that infernal City of Zion were ancillary narrative necessities. Revolutions places them front and center, and we really could not care less if we tried. Along the same lines, the Wachowskis pulled off a modern miracle when they created characters that made the limited acting talents of Keanu Reeves and Carrie-Anne Moss seem downright abundant; here, they foolishly push them aside for secondary characters who aren't really known, much less loved.

The premise of Matrix Revolutions is that everything that has a beginning has an end. The Matrix was about birth, Reloaded was about life, and Revolutions is about death. Too bad it's such an ugly one.


Other Stories This Week in Movies:

Film Review
In the Cut
Wonderland

Film Listings



Other Stories by Shala Carlson:

Cover Story 10 28 03

Cover Story 10 28 03

Film Review 10 20 03

Shala Carlson Archives




Film Reviews

Listings


About Us

Subscribe

Distribution

Advertise

Related Stories


Questions? Comments? E-mail Best of New Orleans!
© 2003, Gambit Communications, Inc.