 |
|
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
|
02 10 04 |
Standing Up for Stalder
Your mostly one-sided feature "Whither Stalder"
(Jan. 27) ignores everything that Richard Stalder has done and is typical of a
left-wing publication in the heart of New Orleans. Pay closer attention to what
Bucky Rives said about the ACA accreditation of every state prison. Only one other
state can make this bold statement. And who better than the ACA -- a world-renowned
jail safety and risk management organization -- to speak about how safe and well-run
a prison is? I suggest we leave it to the experts and not the political pundits
to judge how effective Stalder really is.
Those who speak against Stalder don't have a clear understanding
of what he inherited or of his accomplishments. In one part of the article,
you state that we have the highest incarceration rate in the United States and
that, if we were a country, it would be a worldwide ranking. Subsequently the
article states that we are simply too "huge." Well, where are you going to put
these enormous numbers of people? You criticize him for the highest incarceration
rate in the world and then criticize him for being too large. The last time
I checked, Stalder never sentenced a single individual to serve time in a prison.
This type of attack erodes any legitimate credibility you may have had.
Lastly, Stalder brought the prison system out of federally
mandated control and provided enough beds for the single largest inmate population
per capita on the planet. Blame the judges for imprisoning too many criminals,
not Stalder for creating a cheap space for them to do their time.
Congratulations, Mr. Stalder, on a job well done. Most citizens
of this state support your efforts in providing enough space for all of the
non-working, unproductive drug offenders and criminals put behind bars by district
attorneys.
P.S. Start sending the parents and absentee parents of these
juveniles to serve time with their children and the juvenile justice system
will shrink before our very eyes. If you can be held civilly responsible for
your minor children, why not criminally as well? Oh, that's right; it makes
way too much sense!
--Mark R. Tammariello
Missing the Point
I've appreciated Rick Barton's insights my
entire adult life, ever since his review of Crimes and Misdemeanors way
back in 1989. But he misses the mark completely with Bubba Ho-Tep ("Face
Value," Feb. 3).
In his view, an aging Elvis impersonator fighting a soul-stealing
mummy is a silly distraction that gets in the way of a thoughtful meditation
on identity. Sure, that's one way of looking at it. Or there's this: All of
us pretend to be more than we are and feel superior when we're surrounded by
others engaged in the same pretenses. We all feel constrained, angry and more
than a little befuddled by the circumstances we one day wake up to: unfulfilling
jobs, bad relationships or nursing homes in the armpit of Texas. Most of us
confront soul-sucking adversaries every day, often on distasteful and unfamiliar
turf.
To the extent that a piece of B-movie fluff like Bubba Ho-Tep
is supposed to have a larger, resonant theme, it is this: Sebastian/Elvis quits
feeling sorry for himself and fights off the encroaching demons of indignity
and impending death. He rages, to get literary for a second, against the dying
of the light, a proxy for infirm senior citizens and all our disappointed hopes.
Sebastian Haff -- half? Half a man, perhaps? Come on, Rick. It's not like it's
hidden.
But if you're unwilling to just go with the B-movie trappings,
well then, no, none of it's going to work. If the title didn't clue you in to
Ho-Tep's pedigree, perhaps the fact that it was directed by the guy who
gave us Phantasm -- and stars Bruce Campbell, for crying out loud --
might have nudged you along. There is some small sustenance to be found even
in throwaway films like this one. But it helps to be dialed in to the right
frame of reference first.
--Kevin Forest Moreau
Atlanta, Ga.
Paternity Tests
Mark Twain once said that a lie can make its
way around the world before the truth can get its boots on. He might have been
referring to your article "What Would Jefferson Do?" Jan. 20), which states, "Jefferson
... sired a child by his slave Sally Hemings ... and [never] acknowledged his
own paternity of the child by Hemings." I really have to wonder about your agenda
and your motives in presenting such a statement as if it were a fact.
Dr. Eugene Foster, the pathologist who led the 1998 genetic
analyses, stated in The New York Times (Nov. 9, 1998) that "the genetic
findings my collaborators and I reported in the scientific journal Nature
do not prove that Thomas Jefferson was the father of one of Sally Hemings's
children. We never made that claim. Nor do we believe that the Y-chromosome
type we found in a Hemings descendent occurs only in members of the Jefferson
family. Long before we had any idea of what the genetic findings would be, I
repeatedly said for the record that this study could not prove anything conclusively."
The Jefferson-Hemings Scholars Commission of 13 eminent historians,
after spending a year reviewing all of the historical evidence, concluded that
"it is our unanimous view that the allegation is by no means proven; and we
find it regrettable that public confusion about the 1998 DNA testing and other
evidence has misled many people into believing that the issue is closed. With
the exception of one member ... our individual conclusions range from serious
skepticism about the charge to a conviction that it is almost certainly untrue."
The sole dissenting member of the commission stated: "I dissent
only in believing it somewhat more likely than not that Thomas Jefferson was
the father of Eston Hemings. ... It is, this fact notwithstanding, a mistake
to jump to the conclusion that Jefferson must have been the father of Sally
Heming's children."
--Bill Myers
Healthful Advice
Re: "Dotcom Doctors" (Health & Wellness, Feb.
3). A great and true topic very well-explained by Nital Sheridan. These Internet
seminars/ forums should be held all over the area. My daughter was saved by
such information; when a doctor prescribing her medicine was shown the side
effect, he said he believed the manufacturer did not reveal the side effect.
He was apologetic and grateful for the information he was provided.
--Suren Patel
| Letters is an open forum for our readers. Letters should be original to Gambit Weekly and be no longer than 400 words. Letters might be edited for length and clarity. Write to Letters, c/o Gambit Weekly, 3923 Bienville St., NOLA, 70119; fax to (504) 483-3116, or send email to response@gambitweekly.com. Include a home address and daytime phone number. |

Other Stories This Week in News & Views:
Commentary
Toward Sensible Reforms
News Feature
A Blockbuster Report
Doors Still Open
Bouquets & Brickbats
The Best and the Worst of the Week
Politics
Insider Drama Over Corrections Job
Virgets
Valentine's Verses
Penny Post
Dex: A Short Novel

|
 |