alpelican, you are definitely learning how to identify sappers. Even if they were occurring naturally, they have certain characteristics. "Jim Jones", well his dad was KKK and that's how People's Temple came to be owned by KKK. Not all of the people who died with Jones in Guiana were poisoned, many were shot, and the congressman did not drink the bullets that killed him, either. You have correctly noted Darby's narcissism and mission to cult-ivate a cult of personality, and to manipulate.
I wonder if Darby rose due to executive skills, or fund-raising success that made it seem good to give him a title. At some point with a narcissistic manipulator somebody has to notice a lack of compassion, and his policy goals would have been more of a loyalty test for his disciples than identifiable as compassionate for those in need.
In the same context, Darby says he learned that the local government was being constructive, but another thing you would get with a sapper, according to labor history described by Bill Fletcher blackcommentator.com, would be that a Darby would go along with gentrification and other govt policies just as he goes along as a subtle cointelop, analogous to labor union leaders who in the name of patriotism sell out domestically, or narrow focus in a racist way to please the govt. Did Darby sell out to local govt, too, for instance on demolition for gentrification? What was his compassion quotient?
Government sappers are attracted to activism like pedophiles to little league. We have to learn their m.o., if anything in order NOT to be crippled by paranoia and confusion! It's like internet trolls, in fact we can learn a lot from the internet problem.
Darby's Orwellian mind is expressed in his opinion that COINTELOPs defend rather than suppress freedom of speech and assembly. That expressed level of skewed mindset did not appear overnight by injection. It took the very same skewed, backwards mindset to spin Crow's purchase of a rifle into a hyper conjured scaffolding and oh-so-convenient relevence to a court-room where rifles are physically kind of impossible to carry, you know? When I go to a local courthouse for any reason, such as to look at land records, I have to leave my cell phone in the car. RIFLE? Get serious.
Please, recognize as one mind, a typical sapper's opinions such as Darby's initial rallying cry advocating violence against the government, not standard for a philosophical "anarchist", and then his twisted assertion that COINTELOPs defend rights of freedom of speech and assembly, and then his hyper-hysterical yet government-issue standard spin on Crow's buying a rilfe as having anything to do with the INSIDE of a courthouse, and you can see standard provocateur mindset, baiting from the start with advocating violence himself, and perennial Orwellian BLACK PROPAGANDA tactics typical of COINTELOP sappers.
I think we can also see more subtle tactics, or signs, of a sapper in several things he did to brand a movement to alienate support base, such as advocating violence and carrying a gun, and then his use of leadership position to further poison by divisiveness. There is a saboteur from the get-go.
If somebody advocates violence at the outset, be suspicious. That is both bait, and a tactic to alienate support base, like carrying a gun beyond the first week after the hurricane. Look for a security background or short jail sentences suggesting cooperation. Look at his money. Above all, listen for that hyper hysterical two-dimensional inhumanity of an ad hoc personality!
Powered by Foundation