<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Rosemary&amp;#146;s Baby &amp;#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals
    
      by Clancy DuBos</title>
      <link>http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/Rss.xml?oid=1306441&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Rosemary&amp;#146;s Baby &amp;#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals
    
      by Clancy DuBos</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Gambit. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Gambit readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Gambit.</copyright>
      <webMaster>vip@gambitweekly.com (Gambit Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:30:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312856]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312856]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Culpepper]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[And, voila, as though from nowhere, suddenly speculation on Letten's future. Is this why Nagin's always so smug and cofident?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Culpepper]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:25:02 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312851]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312851]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Culpepper]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Clancy - How about one more element for the timeline?: The transparency hearing on Thursday, February 19th? And then also the aborted hearing and events of of Wednesday February 25th and 26th?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Culpepper]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:01:07 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312850]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312850]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Clancy DuBos]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Frolic,
    Sorry I didn't respond earlier. In the strictest legal sense, adverse parties are on opposites sides of an "action," which usually means a lawsuit or case.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/Profile?oid=1309659">Clancy DuBos</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:31:43 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312849]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312849]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Clancy DuBos]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Culpepper and Superd, I think you're both correct.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/Profile?oid=1309659">Clancy DuBos</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:14:21 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312848]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312848]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Superdeformed]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Culpepper - "Question: why wouldn&#146;t Ledet (1) order production of the backup tapes, and/or (2) appoint an independent IT specialist to go in and verify what happened" Sadly, most people outside of IT don't even know such things exist.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Superdeformed]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:45:57 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312844]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312844]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[dambala]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Clay, I bet you a case of beer cola Washington and Moses-Fields will be in that number.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          dambala]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:55:58 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312841]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312841]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Clay]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[If memory serves, doesn't the Louisiana Bar Association disbar more lawyers each year than any other bar association in the country? Random statistic that stuck in my head.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Clay]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:33:57 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312840]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312840]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Culpepper]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Clancy, thanks a lot for the timeline, this has been long needed by the papers and tv news in this convoluted story. - Question: why wouldn't Ledet (1) order production of the backup tapes, and/or (2) appoint an independent IT specialist to go in and verify what happened when, check all hard drives and servers and also make a copy for independent searching for Nagin's emails (after even if his emails were gone, which may be dubious, the emails from other authors, recipients or others would still be available).
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Culpepper]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:15:46 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Rosemary&#146;s Baby &#151; Or, Thoughts on the Latest Scandals]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312839]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2009/03/15/rosemarys-baby-or-thoughts-on-the-latest-scandals/#1312839]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Frolic]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Clancy, would the council and city be considered adverse parties even though no lawsuit had yet been filed? And if public discussion of a lawsuit is enough, then would that also apply to White and the council?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Frolic]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:41:04 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



