<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Science vs. Politics, Round 2
    
      by Clancy DuBos</title>
      <link>http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/science-vs-politics-round-2/Content?oid=1972445</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/Rss.xml?oid=1972445&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Science vs. Politics, Round 2
    
      by Clancy DuBos</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Gambit. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Gambit readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Gambit.</copyright>
      <webMaster>vip@gambitweekly.com (Gambit Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science vs. Politics, Round 2]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/science-vs-politics-round-2/Content?oid=1972445&show=comments#1973011]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.bestofneworleans.com/gambit/science-vs-politics-round-2/Content?oid=1972445&show=comments#1973011]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Critical Critic]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[This article claims that the LSEA is all about "faith", but if you read the law, it makes it unmistakably clear that the law does NOT protect the teaching of religion:<br>
<br>
"This Section shall not be construed to promote any religious doctrine,<br>
promote discrimination for or against a particular set of religious beliefs, or promote discrimination for or against religion or nonreligion"<br>
<br>
So how could this law allow the teaching of creationist religious views in the classroom? The answer?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Critical Critic]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:18:47 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.bestofneworleans.com">Gambit</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



