In response to your article "New Orleans
to Palestine" by Frank Etheridge (Aug. 12):
A New Orleans resident was shot at by a foreign army. He was part of a delegation
of human rights activists from New Orleans visiting Palestine to support peace
and justice in the Middle East. While there, the group observed and documented
daily, brutal violations of international law -- and violations of the U.S.-led
"road map" -- committed by the Israeli military.
All of this would make a great story. Unfortunately, Gambit missed
this opportunity, instead running an article filled with half-truths and lazy
reporting. As one of the New Orleans residents mentioned in the piece, I feel
the need to respond.
Instead of writing a compelling story on first-hand perspectives on the Middle
East conflict, your writer chose to spend almost half his story profiling anti-Palestinian
activists and printing their misleading statements.
1. Etheridge writes: "In dispute is whether the wall (Israeli's "Apartheid
Wall") follows the 'the green line.'" Etheridge doesn't back up his claim that
there is a dispute on this subject -- indeed, that would be hard. Virtually
no one claims that Israel's Wall follows any kind of internationally recognized
border. George W. Bush, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice have all made widely
publicized statements acknowledging this fact. The Wall, according to Israel's
own projections, will confiscate up to 50 percent of the West Bank.
2. International Solidarity Movement (ISM) activists are "being human shields
to people." Etheridge repeats this claim by pro-Israeli extremist Adam Bronstone
without challenge. In fact, he follows this quote with an uncritical profile
of two New Orleans residents, Vivian Kahn and Yaakova Mize, who have actually
volunteered to assist the Israeli military -- the fourth largest military in
the world -- during its current campaign of violence and intimidation against
the people of Palestine.
3. "Israel defends the razings (of Palestinian homes) as an effort to curb
suicide bombings." This is Bronstone's central argument -- that ISM activists
are defending terrorists. Your writer even furthers this with the potentially
libelous implication that Rachel Corrie was killed while protecting the home
of a suicide bomber. To my knowledge, Gambit is the first newspaper anywhere
in the world to make this claim. She was staying in the home of a doctor. This
doctor lived on land close to a military base, and Israel was seeking to demolish
all the homes in this area to expand its military base. Israel's practice of
home demolitions began with its founding, in 1948, when more than 500 Palestinian
villages were demolished, leaving more than 800,000 refugees. The practice continues
to this day. It is about the theft of the land and the ethnic cleansing of a
people, nothing more and nothing less. It is this reality that I witnessed on
the ground in Palestine.
CLARIFICATION:
--Jordan Flaherty
While the wall has created diplomatic tensions -- President George W. Bush
has called it a "problem" -- Flaherty correctly notes that the route's relationship
to the "green line" has not been the center of dispute. In our reporting of
activist Rachel Corrie's death, we did not intend to suggest that Corrie specifically
was protecting the home of a suicide bomber. Rather, critics of International
Solidarity Movement have claimed that the group, as a whole, shields the homes
of bombers. ISM workers, including Flaherty, deny that charge.
"Guilt Through Association"
In the article "New Orleans to Palestine" (Aug. 12),
it is important to note the sincerity of the people who have traveled from this
city to the Middle East and their interest in peace. Thomas Bacon is indicative
of this sincerity when he clearly states at the end of the article that he hopes
for peace for everyone -- Israeli and Palestinian alike.
However, the reader should not and cannot lose focus of the organization --
International Solidarity Movement (ISM) -- that these people joined. While Yaakova
Mize was helping in an emergency room and North American Jews and non-Jews were
donating funds for a summer camp for Israeli children who have lost parents
to suicide bombers, ISM volunteers were standing in front of and with the families
of suicide bombers.
Bacon claims that these bombers are simply making "stupid decisions." The
truth is different. Suicide bombings are planned, funded and calculated from
the very top of terrorist organizations like Hamas and the Palestinian Authority,
by former leaders such as Saddam Hussein, and by American "allies" like the
Saudi Arabian government. There is no stupidity in these decisions, only planned
hatred and inhumanity; for this reason family members of bombers must take some
responsibility for the actions of their sons and daughters.
Like Thomas Bacon, I want peace for both Israelis and Palestinians. However,
aligning oneself with an organization like ISM that clearly agrees with violence
is not just a matter of guilt by association. It is guilt through association.
Peace in the Middle East will come when organizations like ISM begin to stand
against violence and suicide bombings, rather than in front of and with those
who are associated with such acts of inhumanity. I ask: why were Thomas Bacon,
Adam Wilson and Jordan Flaherty standing with violence, rather than against
it, if what they seek is peace?
--Roselle M. Ungar
Recognizing Southern Art
I wanted to write a note of thanks to Constance Adler
for a wonderful article on the Ogden Museum ("The Making of a Museum," Aug. 19).
It was a beautifully written, comprehensive piece on a museum that will finally
bring national attention to the many talented artists of the South.
My husband is Richard Johnson, and we both had to laugh at the "paint still
drying" comment. He has worked on the painting for seven and a half months and
it has most definitely been a work in progress the entire time.
I have often thought how Southern writers and Southern food have risen to
national visibility but Southern artists have remained more regionalized. Thanks
to Roger's vision this museum will change that restriction.
Again, kudos for a terrific article.
--Babs Johnson